Comparative Analysis of Teaching Methods in EFL Education: German and Chinese School Practices Across Levels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v9i1.1428Keywords:
EFL education, Germany, China, teaching methods, English proficiencyAbstract
This comparative analysis examines the teaching methods in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education in Germany and China across various educational levels. While Germany emphasizes immersive learning and practical language application, China focuses more on theoretical understanding. Despite these differences, both nations share a commitment to enhancing English proficiency among students. Evaluating effective teaching methods for adult second language acquisition in English requires careful consideration of the strengths of each approach, as well as individual preferences, learning styles, and cultural contexts. Considering the multicultural and international perspectives, Total Physical Response (TPR) is recommended as a valuable adjunct from primary school level onwards, alongside a synthesis of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and the Grammar-Translation (GT) Method. Furthermore, the augmentation of the Natural Approach can enhance the language learning experience. The findings offer pedagogical insights for Chinese educators to develop a more tailored English education methodology that aligns with China’s specific context.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Asian Education Studies. The copyright for all articles published in this journal is retained by the authors. All articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, whether commercial or non-commercial, provided the original work is properly cited.