Live-Problem Project v. Client-Based Project: Which Is Most Effective for Perceived Learning of MBA-Level Marketing Concepts?

Authors

  • TL Hill Temple University Author
  • Dennis Paris Temple University Author
  • David Nash Temple University Author
  • Gary Blau Temple University Author

Abstract

We utilize a research design of the same professor teaching consistent course material across a core MBA marketing course to test whether a live-problem project (LPP) or a client-consulting project (CCP) is perceived by students as more effective for learning fundamental marketing concepts. Using teaching evaluation data, MBA students reported higher perceived learning from classes featuring a LPP versus those featuring a CCP. We speculate that LPPs may be more appropriate for teaching core marketing classes and CCPs for more advanced, integrative classes, such as the MBA capstone. Study limitations and future research issues are discussed. 

Author Biographies

  • TL Hill, Temple University
    NULL
  • Dennis Paris, Temple University
    NULL
  • David Nash, Temple University
    NULL
  • Gary Blau, Temple University
    NULL

Published

2020-10-12

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Live-Problem Project v. Client-Based Project: Which Is Most Effective for Perceived Learning of MBA-Level Marketing Concepts?. (2020). International Research in Economics and Finance. https://journal.chapjulypress.org/index.php/iref/article/view/1054